Antagonistic, biofilm-forming rhizospheric Pseudomonas spp. isolated from Hail province

Abdel Moneim Sulieman, Abdel Moneim E. Sulieman, Vajid N. Veettil, Mejdi Snoussi

Abstract


Background: The objectives of this study were to characterize Pseudomonas rhizospheric strains, that have a biocontrol activity, in rhizosphere soil in Hail province and study their ability to form biofilm.

Methods: Rhizosphere soil samples were collected from rhizosphere of soil plantation areas, to be used for bacteria isolation. The identified bacteria were qualitatively tested for their ability to produce slime and subsequently develop biofilm.

Results: The cultural and biochemical identification techniques, including morphological, biochemical and molecular methods revealed that the antagonistic bacteria- from the distinctive rhizosphere soil samples belong to Pseudomonas genus in particular, P. aeruginosa (PF1a, pf2a, PF-8) and P. putida (PF-7). These identified isolates inhibited Aspergillus niger development with percentage of parasitic growth inhibition greater than (48.095 ± 2.182)% for P. aeruginosa (pf-8). In addition, these identified isolates were significantly shown to be able to produce exopolysaccharide and subsequently develop biofilm on polystyrene and glass surfaces.

Conclusion: Superior strains of these bio-control and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria will enable for better biological control of fungal and bacterial plant diseases and may reduce chemical pesticide usage. The indigenous strains isolated could potentially have a great impact on controlling plant diseases, in particular, those caused by microorganisms, and could be used as an alternative bio control agents instead of harmful chemical pesticides. Most of the tried microbes produced exopolysaccharides as well as formed biofilm on polystyrene and glass surfaces.

Keywords: Biological control, Rhizosphere; Biofilm; Pseudomonas; Antimicrobial

 

Full Text:

PDF

References


Serge S, Andrea F, Jean-Noël A. Crop losses due to diseases and their implications for global food production losses and food security. Food Science, (2012); 4: 519–537.

Sai SK, Prasad V, Davide G, Emilio S. Review Plant Growth Promoting and Biocontrol Activity of Streptomyces spp. as Endophytes. International Journal of Molecular Science, (2018): 19(4); 1-26.

Gurr GM, Kvedaras OL. Synergizing Biological Control: Scope for Sterile Insect Technique, Induced Plant Defences and Cultural Techniques to Enhance Natural Enemy Impact. Biological Control, (2010); 52(3): 198-207.

Deacon JW. Significance of ecology in the development of biocontrol agents against soil-borne plant pathogens. Biocontrol Science and Technology, (1991); 1(1): 5-20.

Mohamed AI, Natalya G, Matthew J, Lee AB. Bacillus thuringiensis. A genomics and proteomics perspective. Bioengineered bugs, (2010); 1(1): 31-50.

Brittan SS, Robert PD, John JL, Gary BH. Microbiology, Genomics, and Clinical Significance of the Pseudomonas fluorescens Species Complex, an Unappreciated Colonizer of Humans. Clinical Microbiological Reviews, (2014); 27(4): 927–948.

Migula W, Bacteriaceae (Stabchen bakterien). Die Naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Ehgler, A., Prantl, N (eds). (1985); 2-30. Tiel, I., Abt La, W. Engelmann publishers

Migula W. System der Bakterien. Handbuck der Morphologie, Entwickelung-Geschichte und Systematik der Bakterien. (1990); 25-28, Verlag von Gustav Fischer.

Haas D, Defago G. Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonds. Nature Reviews Microbiology, (2005); 3(4): 307-319.

Seeley HW, Van Demark PJ. Microbes in action. A laboratory manual of Microbiology. 3 rd Edition (1981); 350. W.H Freeman and Company U.S.A

Sullivan G, Leake B, Wells KB. Quality of Life of Seriously Mentally Ill Persons in Mississippi. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, (1991); 42(7): 752 –755.

Apun KA, Jong BC, Salleh MA. Screening and isolation of a cellulolytic and amylolytic Bacillus from sago pith waste. Journal of General and Applied Microbiology, (2000); 46(5): 8-9.

Buchanan RE, Gibbons NE. Bergey’s manual of Determinative Bacteriology. (1974); 315-317, Williams & Wilkins Co., Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Weisburg W, Susan GM, Barns M, Dale A, Pelltier A, David JL. 16S Ribosomal DNA Amplification for Phylogenetic Study. Journal of Bacteriology, (1991): 173(2): 697-703.

Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution, (2016); 33(7): 1870-1874.

Basic Local Search Alignment. National Center for Biotechnology Information. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6:molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, (2013); 30(12): 2725–2729.

Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research, (1997):

(24): 4876–4882.

Jukes TH, Cantor CR. Evolution of Protein Molecules, In: H. N. Munro, Ed., Mammalian Protein Metabolism. (1969); 21-132. Academic Press, New York.

Bordoloi G, Kumari B, Guha A, Bordoloi MJ, Roy MK, Bora TC. Isolation and structural elucidation of a new antifungal and antibacterial antibiotic produced by Streptomyces sp. 201. Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, (2001); 65: 1856–8.

Freeman DJ, Falkiner FR, Keane CT. New method for detecting slime production by coagulase negative staphylococci. Journal of Clinical Pathology, (1989); 42: 872-874.

Sechi LA, Lezcano I, Nunez N, Espim M, Duprè I, et al. Antibacterial Activity of Ozonized Sunflower Oil (Oleozon). Journal of Applied Microbiology, (2001); 90: 279–84.

Toledo-Arana A, Jaione V, Cristina S, María J, Arrizubieta, CC, et al. The Enterococcal Surface Protein, Esp, Is Involved in Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm Formation. Applied Environmental Microbiology, (2001): 67(10): 4538–4545.

Stepanovic S, Vukovic D, Dakic L, Savic B, Svabic-Vlahovic M. A modified microtiter-plate for quantification of staphylococcal biofilm formation. Journal of Microbiological Methods, (2007); 40(2): 175-179.

Rosselló-Mora R, Amann R. The species concept for prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiology Review, (2001); 25(1): 39–67.

Jayashree K, Shanmugam V, Raguchander T, Ramanathan A, Samiyappan A. Evaluation of Pseudomonas jluorescens (Pf-l) against black gram and sesame root-rot disease. Biological Control, (2000); 14(2): 55-61.

Palleroni NJ, Doudoroff M, Stanier RY, Solanes RE. Mandel M Taxonomy of the aerobic pseudomonads: the properties of the Pseudomonas stutzeri group. Journal of General Microbiology, (1970); 60(2): 215-231.

Palleroni NJ, Introduction to the Family Pseudomonadaceae. In: Starr MP, Truper, H.G, Balows A, Schleger, H.G. (Eds.), the Procaryotes, a Handbook on Habitat, Isolation and Identification of Bacteria. Springer-Verlag, New York, (1983); 655-718.

Kremer RJ, Begonia MFT, Stanley L, Lanham EeT, Characterization of rhizobacteria associated with weed seedlings. Applied Environmental Microbiology, (1990); 56(6): 1649-1655. 00

Cartwright DK, Benson DM Comparison of Pseudomonas species and application techniques for biocontrol of Rhizoctonia stem rot of poinsettia. Plant Disease, (1995); 79: 309-313.

Sonia S, Aparna D, Gupta BL, Gupta S. Optimization of Cellulase Production from Bacteria Isolated from Soil. Biotechnology, (2013); 7: 985685,

Magnelli P, Forchiassin F. Regulation of the cellulase complex production by Saccobolus saccoboloides: induction and repression by carbohydrates. Mycologia, (1999); 91(2): 359–364.

Immanuel G., Akila BC, Iyappa RP, Esakkiraj P, Palavesam A. . Production and Partial purification of Cellulase by Aspergillus niger and A. fumigates fermented in coir waste and sawdust. International Journal of Microbiology, (2009); 3(1): 1-11.

Akter S, Kadir J, Juraimi AS, Saud HM, Elmahdi S. Isolation and identification of antagonistic bacteria from phylloplane of rice as biocontrol agents for sheath blight. Journal of Environmental Biology, (2014); 35: 1095-1100.

Basha SA, Begum S, Raghavendra S. Search for Agrochemical and Heavy Metal Tolerant Strains of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Rhizobium. Indian Journal of Plant Protection (2014); 42(1): 71-77.

Woese C R. Bacterial evolution. Microbiology Reviews, (1987); 51; 221– 271.

Relman DA, Falkow S. Identification of uncultured microorganisms: expanding the spectrum of characterized microbial pathogens. Infectious agents and disease, (1992); 1: 245–253.

Weller DM. Biological control of soilborne plant pathogens in the rhizosphere with bacteria. Annual Review Phytopathology, (1988) 26:379-407.

Weller DM, Raaijmakers JM, McSpadden GB, Thomashow LS. Microbial populations responsible for specific soil suppressiveness to plant pathogens. Annual Review Phytopathology, (2002); 40: 309- 348.

López D, Vlamakis Hera, Kolter R. "Biofilms". Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, (2010); 2(7): 35-39.

Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nature Reviews Microbiology, (2004); 2(2): 95–108.

Aggarwal, S, Stewart P, Hozalski R. Biofilm Cohesive Strength as a Basis for Biofilm Recalcitrance: Are Bacterial Biofilms Overdesigned? Microbiology Insights, (2016); 8(2): 29-32.

Rewatkar AR, Wadher BJ. Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Biofilm formation Methods. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences, (2013); 8(5): 36-40.

Basavaraju A, Praveena M. Detection of Biofilm Producing Bacteria on Invasive Medical Devices and their Antibiogram. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, (2016): 7(7): 3053-3059.

Manikandan Suresh R, Raja SS, Vijayakumar R. Comparative Evaluation of Methods to Detect Biofilm Formation by Bacterial Isolates of Poultry Environments. Journal of scientific transactions in Environment and technovation, (2016): 10(1): 1-5.

Lima JL, Lilian RA, Niedja P, Marcelle AR, Maria AV, Marcia MC. Analysis of biofilm production by clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, (2017); 29(3): 310-316.


Refbacks