Genome-Wide Identification of Natural Selection Footprints in Bos Indicus Using Principal Component Analysis
Abstract
Background: To describe natural selection, numerous analytical methods for ascertaining candidate genomic region have been developed. There is a substantial drive in population genomics to identify loci intricate in local adaptation. A potent method to find genomic regions subject to local adaptation is to genotype numerous molecular markers and look for outlier loci.
Methods: In this study, population structure and genome wide footprints scan of natural selection in cattle was performed using principal component analysis based on alternative individual method assumed in the PCAdapt R-package. This method was used on the hypothesis that extremely related population markers are also local population adaptation candidates. To test PCAdaptmethod in cattle, the data of sixty three animals were collected from four different origins or agro-ecological zones (Achai = 18, Cholistani = 13, Lohani = 19, and Tharparkar = 13) and genotyped using the high density SNPs BeadChip.
Results: As expected from the sampling from different zones the principal component result indicated the clear division in these animals into three clusters. K=3 was the optimal number suggested by eigenvalues.
Conclusion: The result of this study revealed that the genomic regions harboring signals of the candidate genes were associated with immunity system and muscle formation. Signature of selection detecting in this study targeted the historical adaptation in these breeds that will be useful in future to understand cattle origin under different environment.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
O’Neill CJ, Swain DL, Kadarmideen HN. Evolutionary process of Bos taurus cattle in favourable versus unfavourable environments and its implications for genetic selection. Evolutionary Applications, (2010); 3(5‐6): 422-433.
Moravčíková N, Kukučková V, Mészáros G, Sölkner J, Kadlečík O, et al. Assessing footprints of natural selection through PCA analysis in cattle. Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica, (2017); 20(2); 23-27.
Martins H, Caye K, Luu K, Blum MG, Francois O. Identifying outlier loci in admixed and in continuous populations using ancestral population differentiation statistics. Molecular ecology, (2016); 25(20): 5029-5042.
Duforet-Frebourg N, Bazin E, Blum MG. Genome scans for detecting footprints of local adaptation using a Bayesian factor model. Molecular biology and evolution, (2014); 31(9): 2483-2495.
Duforet-Frebourg N, Luu K, Laval G, Bazin E, Blum MG. Detecting genomic signatures of natural selection with principal component analysis: application to the 1000 Genomes data. Molecular biology and evolution, (2015); 33(4): 1082-1093.
Nielsen R. Molecular signatures of natural selection. Annu Rev Genet, (2005); 39: 197-218.
Akey JM, Zhang G, Zhang K, Jin L, Shriver MD. Interrogating a high-density SNP map for signatures of natural selection. Genome research, (2002); 12(12): 1805-1814.
Bierne N, Roze D, Welch JJ. Pervasive selection or is it…? why are FST outliers sometimes so frequent? Molecular ecology, (2013); 22(8): 2061-2064.
Waples RS, Gaggiotti O. INVITED REVIEW: What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity. Molecular ecology, (2006); 15(6): 1419-1439.
Luu K, Bazin E, Blum MG. pcadapt: an R package to perform genome scans for selection based on principal component analysis. Molecular ecology resources, (2017); 17(1): 67-77.
Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. The American Journal of Human Genetics, (2007); 81(3): 559-575.
Storey JD. A direct approach to false discovery rates. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), (2002); 64(3): 479-498.
McClure M, Ramey H, Rolf M, McKay S, Decker J, et al. Genome‐wide association analysis for quantitative trait loci influencing Warner–Bratzler shear force in five taurine cattle breeds. Animal genetics, (2012); 43(6): 662-673.
Giusti J, Castan E, Dal Pai M, Arrigoni MDB, Baldin SR, et al. Expression of genes related to quality of Longissimus dorsi muscle meat in Nellore (Bos indicus) and Canchim (5/8 Bos taurus× 3/8 Bos indicus) cattle. Meat Science, (2013); 94(2): 247-252.
Gowane G, Sharma A, Sankar M, Narayanan K, Bisht P, et al. The expression of IL6 and 21 in crossbred calves upregulated by inactivated trivalent FMD vaccine. Animal biotechnology, (2014); 25(2): 108-118.
Gutiérrez-Gil B, Arranz JJ, Wiener P. An interpretive review of selective sweep studies in Bos taurus cattle populations: identification of unique and shared selection signals across breeds. Frontiers in genetics, (2015); 6167.
Qanbari S, Gianola D, Hayes B, Schenkel F, Miller S, et al. Application of site and haplotype-frequency based approaches for detecting selection signatures in cattle. BMC genomics, (2011); 12(1): 318.
Druet T, Pérez‐Pardal L, Charlier C, Gautier M. Identification of large selective sweeps associated with major genes in cattle. Animal genetics, (2013); 44(6): 758-762.
Stella A, Ajmone-Marsan P, Lazzari B, Boettcher P. Identification of selection signatures in cattle breeds selected for dairy production. Genetics, (2010); 185(4): 1451-1461.
Flori L, Fritz S, Jaffrézic F, Boussaha M, Gut I, et al. The genome response to artificial selection: a case study in dairy cattle. PloS one, (2009); 4(8): e6595.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.62940/als.v5i2.558
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.